US Vice President Mike Pence reiterated this week that the "era of strategic patience" was over, days after Pyongyang attempted another missile launch and analysts warned a sixth nuclear test could be imminent.
Through all the rhetoric and saber-rattling however, it can be difficult to answer what should be a simple question:
North
Korea is a nuclear-armed state with a wide-ranging missile program
capable of medium to long-range strikes. It also possesses a large
arsenal of conventional, chemical and biological weapons.
The
number of missiles paraded in Pyongyang this week was "something of a
scale we've never seen before," said David Schmerler, a research
associate at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies.
The "vast number" of solid-fuel
missiles on display was "most likely intended to drive home the point
that (North Korea) has achieved the technical capability to produce
longer-range solid-fuel missiles," he said.
Such
weapons can be stored ready for launch for longer periods of time and
require less preparation, making a surprise attack easier.
North Korea has long claimed
that it is capable of miniaturizing a nuclear weapon in order to attach
it to an ICBM, and Kim has vowed to test an intercontinental missile in the near future.
It has also conducted apparently successful tests of submarine-launched ballistic missiles that increase the range from which potential attacks could be staged.
"The
number of tests, range and sophistication have gone up exponentially
under Kim Jong Un," Euan Graham, an analyst at the Lowy Institute in
Sydney, told CNN last month.
The
North Koreans "have a fixed set of aims and ambitions, they want a
nuclear weapon that's attached to a ballistic missile system," said Nick
Bisley, an analyst at Melbourne's La Trobe University.
Earlier this month, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe warned that North Korea may already have the capability to hit Japan with missiles tipped with the deadly nerve agent sarin.
North
Korea is one of only six countries not to have signed or acceded to the
Chemical Weapons Convention and both the US and South Korea have said
it possesses large stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons.
"They have no interest in
talking, they're interested in locking in their gains," he said. "The
hatches are down, economically Kim Jong Un has already priced in extra
sanctions."
Joe Bermudez,
an analyst with 38 North, said North Korea "believes the only way to
deter the US from attacking them, and maintaining the power of the Kim
regime is by the possession of nuclear weapons."
"They've repeatedly stated that if Libya or Iraq had nuclear weapons the US would not have attacked them," he said.
Some argue that the threat from North Korea hasn't changed, but what has changed is attitudes in Washington and Tokyo.
In Japan, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is attempting to rewrite the country's pacifist constitution
to enable it to strike overseas, while US President Donald Trump has
proven to be keen on foreign interventions despite his isolationist
campaign promises.
Jean
Lee, a global fellow at the US-based Wilson Center, said that many South
Koreans, who are most at risk of any conflict with North Korea, are
less concerned with the rhetoric coming from Pyongyang as that coming
from Washington.
"We know
the North Koreans are going to push things to the edge, they always do,
we don't know how President Trump will respond," she told CNN.
"The
rhetoric and aggressive tone in the region right now feeds (Kim Jong
Un's) resolve to continue developing and building nuclear missiles."
While the number of North Korean missile tests may have increased, but their reliability remains in question. The most recent ended in embarrassing failure, as have many others.
Particularly
prone to failure is the intermediate-range Musudan missile, believed to
be the country's most domestically-developed and therefore easiest to
build.
Tal Inbar, an
analyst with the Fisher Institute for Air and Space Strategic Studies,
said a reasonable amount of flight tests for an ICBM "would be at least
six to eight successful launches." So far North Korea hasn't conducted
one.
"The question remains of what would be the reliability of a missile that has never flown before," he said.
Claims
about intercontinental capabilities should therefore be taken with a
large grain of salt, said weapons expert Markus Schiller.
He
said that while North Korean propaganda "looks impressive," it is also
often wildly misleading. In particular, he points to the vast number of
ICBMs Pyongyang claims are under development.
"They
want to send a message that they have an ICBM, that they are
dangerous," he told CNN, whereas in fact "they are a very, very long way
away from this."
Multiple
alleged ICBMs on show should lead to skepticism, not fear, he said.
"Four ICBM programs in a country with an estimated GDP roughly half that
of the city of Vienna seems unlikely," Schiller wrote after the "Day of the Sun" military parade.
While North Korea has long been considered dangerous, the threat it poses has remained largely the same since it first tested a nuclear weapon in 2006, analysts say.
Parts of South Korea and Japan have been in range of conventional artillery or medium-range ballistic missiles for decades.
Chemical,
biological and nuclear warheads give an extra, terrifying edge to this
threat, but they too are a known threat and one that has not obviously
increased in recent years.
"The
threat has not changed," said Schiller. "They have always been a threat
within the region, they're just trying to show the world they are
dangerous (as well)."



