Kamau
had moved to the High Court on Tuesday under a certificate of urgency
challenging the summons, on the grounds that his prosecution was
unlawful
Kamau had moved to the High Court on Tuesday under a certificate of urgency challenging the summons, on the grounds that his prosecution was unlawful.
Kamau argued that the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) which recommended his prosecution to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), was not legally constituted at the time and therefore any recommendations it made were null and void.
“The Constitution stipulates very clearly that the commission should be comprised of a chairman and two other commissioners of which there were none when the EACC forwarded my client’s file to the DPP,” lawyer Paul Njuguna argued on behalf of Kamau before Justice Ngugi on Wednesday.
source: Capital FM Kenya